Obama ORDERED Fake Intel — Criminal Probe Launched

(ProsperNews.net) – Newly declassified documents have reignited allegations that the Obama administration knowingly manufactured intelligence to sabotage Donald Trump’s presidency, sparking demands for criminal prosecutions a decade after the 2016 election.

Story Snapshot

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released declassified evidence allegedly showing Obama directed creation of false Intelligence Community Assessment claiming Putin helped Trump
Drew Thomas Allen’s new book connects Clinton email scandal to origins of Russia investigation, citing FBI intel that Clinton campaign planned to tie Trump to Russia as deflection strategy
Trump orders DOJ probe based on declassifications, calling it “biggest political scandal ever” while Obama team dismisses accusations as “ridiculous distraction”
Documents reveal FBI received intelligence about Clinton’s plan in March 2016 but proceeded to investigate Trump using unverified Steele dossier funded by Clinton campaign

Declassified Evidence Fuels Prosecution Calls

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently declassified documents that President Trump claims provide “irrefutable evidence” Barack Obama orchestrated a “years-long coup and treasonous conspiracy” against his presidency. The declassifications center on the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that concluded Putin preferred Trump’s election victory. According to the newly released materials, Obama ordered the ICA on December 9, 2016, and CIA Director John Brennan shaped its conclusions by overriding intelligence analysts. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated the evidence shows Obama “led fraud to sabotage Trump,” prompting the president to order a Department of Justice investigation into potential criminal conduct.

Clinton Campaign Origins and FBI Response

Drew Thomas Allen’s book “Clinton Hoax, Obama Coup: The Declassified Story of the Trump-Russia Delusion” traces the Russia investigation’s origins to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign strategy. According to declassified records cited in the book, the FBI and DOJ were briefed on March 31, 2016, about Clinton’s plan to deflect from her email scandal by tying Trump to Russia. Despite receiving this intelligence, FBI officials proceeded to use the Steele dossier—opposition research funded by Clinton’s campaign—to obtain FISA warrants against Trump associate Carter Page. The dossier’s unverified allegations were laundered through media reports cited as corroboration, creating what Allen describes as a “collusion delusion” that persisted through the Mueller investigation.

Accountability Gap and Institutional Damage

While top Obama administration officials faced no criminal charges despite documented misconduct, lower-level Trump associates suffered financial ruin and reputational harm through process crimes during the Mueller probe. FBI officials James Comey leaked classified memos, Andrew McCabe lied under oath, and Kevin Clinesmith altered an email, yet accountability remained limited to Clinesmith’s probation. This disparity exemplifies a two-tiered justice system where powerful government figures evade consequences while wielding investigative power against political opponents. The weaponization of intelligence agencies against an incoming president represents an unprecedented assault on democratic norms, establishing a dangerous precedent that bureaucrats can override electoral outcomes through manufactured intelligence assessments.

Political Divide Over Evidence and Next Steps

The declassifications have deepened partisan divisions over the Russia investigation’s legitimacy. Trump and House Republicans characterize the evidence as proof of treasonous conspiracy, with the president vowing to pursue justice against Obama and Clinton. Democrats dismiss the accusations as election-year distractions, noting that prior investigations by Inspector General Horowitz and Special Counsel Durham found no direct criminal conspiracy, though Durham’s probe was limited by restricted access to classified materials. Obama’s team called the allegations “bizarre,” while mainstream sources note the original intelligence assessment correctly identified Russian interference aimed at harming Clinton, though it never claimed vote manipulation occurred. The controversy underscores growing bipartisan frustration that government elites operate by different rules, with accountability mechanisms failing regardless of which party controls power.