Biden DOJ’s SHOCKING Bias: Pro-Life Activists Targeted

(ProsperNews.net) – A new Justice Department report claims the Biden-era DOJ turned a law meant to protect public access into a political weapon aimed at pro-life Americans.

Quick Take

The Trump Justice Department released an 882-page “weaponization” report focused on Biden-era enforcement of the 1994 FACE Act.
DOJ leadership says investigators reviewed more than 700,000 internal records and found evidence of selective prosecution and improper coordination with advocacy groups.
The report alleges prosecutors worked closely with pro-abortion organizations to track and build cases against pro-life activists, raising First Amendment and due-process concerns.
DOJ cites sentencing and charging disparities and says it has narrowed FACE Act prosecutions going forward to “extraordinary circumstances.”

What the DOJ says its investigation found

The Department of Justice announced that its Weaponization Working Group completed an 882-page review of Biden-era FACE Act prosecutions, describing the results as evidence of a “two-tiered” approach to law enforcement. DOJ leadership said the review drew on more than 700,000 internal records and concluded that pro-life defendants were treated differently than ideological opponents. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the department will not tolerate selective prosecution based on beliefs.

The FACE Act, passed in 1994, prohibits using force, threats, or obstruction to interfere with access to abortion clinics and pregnancy resource centers. The current report argues that while the statute is written to protect both sides, enforcement priorities under the Biden administration tilted heavily toward cases involving pro-life activists. That allegation matters because even a valid law can become controversial if citizens believe it is enforced unevenly against certain viewpoints.

Alleged collaboration with advocacy groups and ethics concerns

According to the report’s summary as described by DOJ and outlets reviewing it, investigators say prosecutors “closely collaborated” with pro-abortion advocacy organizations—particularly the National Abortion Federation—to monitor pro-life activity and identify targets for investigation. The report also alleges that advocacy groups compiled dossiers that supported warrants and charges. Separately, the report claims a Biden-era prosecutor served as a reference for a private grant application without ethics approval, raising questions about independence.

The report also outlines alleged misconduct tactics that typically alarm civil-liberties advocates across party lines. Investigators claim prosecutors withheld evidence sought by defense counsel, attempted to screen jurors based on religion, and used aggressive arrest strategies rather than allowing defendants to self-surrender. Each allegation, if substantiated in full context, points to a deeper concern than abortion politics: whether federal power was used in ways that could chill lawful speech, religious practice, and peaceful assembly.

Disparate sentencing claims and the “two-tier” debate

One of the most concrete data points highlighted is an alleged sentencing recommendation gap. DOJ’s report states Biden-era prosecutors sought average sentences of 26.8 months for pro-life defendants compared with 12.3 months for pro-abortion defendants. Because sentencing depends on specific conduct and criminal history, that comparison does not, by itself, prove bias. Still, it provides a measurable hook for the broader claim that enforcement and punishment were not applied consistently.

Corrective actions: pardons, dismissals, and narrowed prosecutions

The report arrives after a series of policy and case decisions that already signaled a new direction. President Trump issued full and unconditional pardons to a group of pro-life activists convicted under the FACE Act in January 2025. DOJ also announced it would limit future FACE Act prosecutions to “extraordinary circumstances,” such as cases involving death, serious bodily harm, or serious property damage. DOJ says several civil lawsuits against pro-life activists were dismissed with prejudice.

Trump DOJ publishes report exposing Biden admin persecution of pro-lifershttps://t.co/OrUJBjjgYF

— José Colón (@JoseEColon) April 15, 2026

Politically, the argument over “weaponization” is likely to intensify rather than fade, because it connects to a bipartisan frustration: many Americans believe the system protects insiders and punishes outsiders. Conservatives see the report as proof that culture-war priorities shaped federal power. Many liberals, meanwhile, worry about reduced federal protection for clinics and providers. With limited public access to every underlying document, the most responsible takeaway is that credibility now hinges on transparency and consistent standards—especially when the next administration could reverse course again.