Trump’s Claim SHATTERED by New Video

Military and police personnel in tactical gear standing in an urban area

(ProsperNews.net) – A new video reveals the truth behind the ICE shooting in Minneapolis, challenging claims made by President Trump.

Story Highlights

President Trump claims an ICE officer shot a woman in self-defense, alleging she ran over the officer.
Witness video, shared by Trump, contradicts his claim, leading to public scrutiny.
Minneapolis Mayor rejects Trump’s narrative, demands an independent investigation.
DHS labels the incident as “domestic terrorism,” escalating tensions in Minneapolis.

The Incident in Minneapolis

In early January 2026, an ICE officer fatally shot a 37-year-old U.S. citizen in south Minneapolis. President Trump quickly took to Truth Social, claiming the woman attempted to run over the officer, framing the shooting as self-defense. However, video evidence recorded by bystanders and shared by Trump himself shows discrepancies in his narrative.

The woman, described as a legal observer, was not under arrest but was monitoring federal actions. The incident has sparked outrage, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey calling the federal narrative “bulls**t” and demanding a thorough, independent investigation based on the video evidence, not political rhetoric.

Federal and Local Reactions

The Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, escalated the situation by labeling the driver’s actions as “domestic terrorism.” This characterization has heightened tensions between federal authorities and local Minneapolis leaders who are pushing back against what they see as federal overreach.

Mayor Frey has been vocal in his criticism, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability. The clash between federal and local narratives highlights ongoing tensions in Minneapolis, a city still sensitive to law enforcement actions following the police murder of George Floyd in 2020.

Impact and Implications

This incident underscores the power of video evidence in challenging official accounts. The public’s trust in federal narratives erodes when discrepancies arise, especially when amplified by high-profile figures like President Trump. The situation may lead to increased calls for legal reforms to protect legal observers and ensure independent review of incidents involving law enforcement.

As the investigation unfolds, the incident is likely to fuel further debate over federal versus local authority, potentially impacting cooperation on law enforcement and immigration matters. The Minneapolis community, already wary of police actions, braces for potential protests and unrest, demanding justice and accountability.