(ProsperNews.net) – A recent settlement by the Trump administration marks a pivotal shift in gun regulation by allowing accessories that enable semiautomatic rifles to mimic machine guns.
At a Glance
- The Trump administration has lifted a ban on “forced reset triggers,” enhancing semiautomatic firearms’ firing speed.
- A lawsuit settlement with the National Association for Gun Rights has led to this regulatory shift.
- Forced reset triggers will not be classified as firearms, exempting them from some federal regulations.
- The settlement aligns with recent judicial support for gun rights, referencing a Supreme Court decision on bump stocks.
Reversing an Earlier Ban
The Trump administration’s settlement comes after the reversal of an ATF ban on “forced reset triggers,” which allow semiautomatic firearms to fire rapidly, akin to machine guns. This action follows a legal battle initiated by the National Association for Gun Rights against the ATF’s previous restriction. The settlement represents a significant moment for gun rights advocates, favoring a less strict approach to federal gun regulations.
As part of the agreement, the Justice Department will return seized devices, marking a notable shift in policy. Forced reset triggers will evade firearm classification, allowing them to be purchased without federal scrutiny, potentially changing the landscape for gun retailers and owners.
Perspectives on Gun Rights and Safety
The decision sparked controversy among gun safety advocates who predict an uptick in misuse and public danger. Vanessa Gonzalez of Giffords criticized the move, expressing concerns about its potential to exacerbate gun violence. Meanwhile, proponents, including Attorney General Pamela Bondi, argued for the settlement’s positive alignment with the 2nd Amendment and its supposed enhancement of public safety.
“This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right, And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety.” – Attorney General Pamela Bondi
The 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals supported this pro-gun stance, aligning with the settlement, and even drew comparisons to the Supreme Court’s decision on bump stocks. Detractors worry, however, that this opens doors to future deregulation, further sparking debate over national gun safety policies.
Federal and Legal Implications
This resolution exempts forced reset triggers from the 1986 federal machine gun ban, a significant departure from existing firearm laws that classified automatic weapons under strict regulation. The settlement asserts that the ATF must not further prevent the sales of forced reset triggers. This development highlights the administration’s commitment to deregulating the firearms landscape, a goal extended from Trump’s initial term efforts against bump stocks.
“The Trump administration has just effectively legalized machine guns. Lives will be lost because of his actions, This is an incredibly dangerous move that will enable shooters to inflict horrific damage. The only people who benefit from these being on the market are the people who will make money from selling them, everyone else will suffer the consequences.” – Vanessa Gonzalez
This decision not only reflects a shift in regulatory approach but also risks intensifying the national dialogue surrounding gun control and safety. As all eyes turn to future implications, stakeholders will be closely observing how this affects both gun rights and public safety agendas in the coming years.
​Copyright 2025, ProsperNews.netÂ
